data + articles · 3 listed
newest 2019spec sheet11 rows
Y-134 is a research-stage selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) engineered by fine-tuning the well-known drug raloxifene. Beyond the classic SERM profile of blocking estrogen in breast tissue while supporting bone, Y-134 carries a striking bonus: it switches on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and drives even hard-to-treat triple-negative breast cancer cells into programmed cell death, an effect its parent compound only hinted at. Elegant and highly selective, it is prized as a research tool, though it remains preclinical with no human data.
- a sharpened raloxifene with far cleaner ER alpha selectivity
- blocks estrogen in breast tissue while staying bone friendly
- switches on AhR and pushes triple negative cancer cells to die
- cleaner toxicity readout than raloxifene in early testing
- trims cholesterol on top of the bone and breast effects
- purely preclinical; a beautiful lab tool, no human record yet
- As a SERM, it may carry the class risk of blood clots
- Hot flashes are a possible estrogen-blocking effect
- Leg cramps have been associated with SERMs of this type
Overview
Y-134, also written Y134 and referred to in some work as an analog of raloxifene, is a synthetic selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) created by chemically modifying the approved SERM raloxifene [1][3]. It retains raloxifene's benzothiophene core, and, as a member of the SERM class, it is designed to act as an estrogen antagonist in some tissues, such as the breast, while behaving as an estrogen agonist in others, such as bone; this tissue-selective behavior is the hallmark of SERMs and the reason drugs like raloxifene are used to protect bone and reduce breast cancer risk.
What has drawn scientific attention to Y-134 is a second, less expected property. Research had shown that raloxifene is not only an estrogen receptor ligand but also a ligand for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), through which it can induce cell death in estrogen-receptor-negative cancer cells [2]. In a structure-activity study of seven raloxifene analogs, Y-134 was identified as a standout that strongly activates AhR-mediated activity and triggers apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells, positioning it as a promising lead for further anti-cancer development [1].
Y-134 is strictly a preclinical research compound. It has been studied only in cell and animal models, has never entered human clinical trials, and is not approved as a medicine anywhere; it is available only as a research chemical, and its long-term safety in people is unknown. Its identity as a distinct, more selective raloxifene derivative has been confirmed in independent work, where even small structural differences between raloxifene and Y-134 produced markedly different biological effects [3].
- Y-134 was chosen out of a screen of seven raloxifene analogs as the single best activator of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor for driving cancer cells into apoptosis.
- The parent scaffold, raloxifene, is an approved osteoporosis and breast-cancer-prevention drug; Y-134 is essentially a research-stage side-chain modification of it.
- In zebrafish embryo toxicity testing, Y-134 showed a significantly better safety profile than raloxifene, suggesting the structural change improved tolerability as well as anti-cancer selectivity.
Mechanism
Y-134 operates through two distinct receptor systems, which is what makes it pharmacologically interesting. The first is the receptor. As a selective estrogen receptor modulator built on the raloxifene scaffold, Y-134 belongs to a class of compounds whose defining feature is tissue-selective action: they occupy the estrogen receptor and block estrogen's proliferative signal in breast tissue while mimicking estrogen's protective effects in bone and on cholesterol, the profile that underlies raloxifene's clinical use [1][3]. Modifying raloxifene's side chain, as in Y-134, alters how the receptor complex behaves, and independent work has shown that even minor structural differences between raloxifene and Y-134 can substantially change downstream effects such as cellular calcium handling [3].
The second and more novel mechanism is activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a -activated transcription factor that can suppress cell proliferation and act as a tumor suppressor. Earlier work established that raloxifene itself directly binds the AhR and induces apoptosis in -receptor-negative hepatoma and breast cancer cells in an AhR-dependent manner, independent of the estrogen receptor [2]. Building on this, a structure-activity screen of seven raloxifene analogs singled out Y-134 as a compound that activates AhR-mediated transcription and induces apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells as well as in hepatoma cells; silencing the AhR strongly reduced this apoptosis, confirming that the effect depends on the AhR [1].
The practical appeal that follows from these mechanisms is twofold: the SERM activity offers the familiar benefits of blockade in breast tissue with estrogen support in bone, while the AhR activity opens a route to killing triple-negative breast cancer, a subtype that lacks the targets exploited by most existing therapies [1][2]. Notably, in zebrafish embryo toxicity testing, Y-134 showed a significantly better safety profile than raloxifene, suggesting the modification improved tolerability as well as anti-cancer selectivity [1]. All of these findings come from laboratory and animal studies; Y-134 has not been tested in humans, so its efficacy and safety in people remain unknown.
receptor fingerprint
receptor alpha (breast)antagonist
receptor (bone)agonist
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)activates
receptor betaweak antagonist
Dosingtypical ranges, not medical advice
interested in protocols and clinical dosages? make an account to see them! ^_^
Safetyrisks and cautions, not medical advice
Y-134 is a preclinical research compound with no human trials, so its real-world safety is unmapped. Judging by its raloxifene lineage, the class risks worth flagging are venous blood clots, hot flashes, and leg cramps; raloxifene carries a boxed warning for thromboembolism, and there is no reason to assume an analog is exempt. On the plus side, zebrafish embryo testing found Y-134 notably less toxic than raloxifene itself. It is not approved anywhere and is sold strictly as a research chemical, not for human use. Anyone pregnant or with a clotting history should stay well clear, and the total absence of long-term human data is the honest headline here.
History
Y-134, also written Y134, emerged from the Cancer Research Laboratory in the Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology at Oregon State University, in the group led by Siva Kumar Kolluri. Its origin traces to earlier work by the same laboratory, which in 2014 reported that the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene is also a direct ligand of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and induces AhR-dependent apoptosis in estrogen-receptor-negative cancer cells (O'Donnell et al., Cell Death & Disease, 2014).
Building on that discovery, Jang and colleagues performed a structure-activity study of seven raloxifene analogs to define the structural features required for AhR-mediated transcriptional activity and apoptosis, work published in the journal Biology in December 2017. From this screen they singled out Y-134 as an analog that activates AhR-mediated transcription and induces apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells and in hepatoma cells. The investigators proposed Y-134 as a promising candidate for further optimization as an AhR-targeted anti-cancer agent; it has remained a preclinical research compound with no reported human testing.
Reputation
Within the small community studying the aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a cancer target, Y-134 is regarded as an elegant proof of concept: a modest tweak to a familiar, well-characterized drug that sharpened its most interesting off-target behavior. Researchers find it appealing because it retains the tissue-selective estrogen receptor profile of the raloxifene scaffold while more effectively engaging the AhR to push triple-negative breast cancer cells, a notoriously hard-to-treat subtype, into programmed cell death.
Its dependence on the AhR is clean and well documented; silencing the receptor sharply reduced Y-134-induced apoptosis, which makes it a useful and selective tool for dissecting AhR biology. Adding to its appeal, zebrafish embryo toxicity testing indicated a significantly better safety margin than the parent compound raloxifene. That said, its reputation rests entirely on laboratory and animal studies; Y-134 has never been evaluated in humans, so its real-world efficacy, dosing, and safety are genuinely unknown and it should be understood strictly as a research chemical.
Subjective profileweighing the evidence above
Y-134 is a genuinely interesting SERM on paper; more breast-selective than raloxifene, with a friendlier toxicity read in fish and cells, plus that odd AhR-driven anticancer trick. The catch is that it basically stalled at the preclinical stage, so it is a lab curiosity for now, not something with any human track record behind it.
Where to buy
Suppliers
Vendors carrying Y-134, with live product details and codes. Links are affiliate links that support the wiki at no cost to you.
Kimera Chems
Y-134
Research
- 2014first citedThe aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates raloxifene-induced apoptosis in estrogen receptor-negati…
- 2019most recentThe selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene mitigates the effect of all-trans-retinal…
- 1.Identification of a Raloxifene Analog That Promotes AhR-Mediated Apoptosis in Cancer Cells
- 2.The aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediates raloxifene-induced apoptosis in estrogen receptor-negative hepatoma and breast cancer cells
- 3.The selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene mitigates the effect of all-trans-retinal toxicity in photoreceptor degeneration
3 listed here; entry last updated August 2026
Reviews
My notesprivate to this device
FAQ
What is Y-134?
It is a research SERM derived from raloxifene, notable for being very selective for the ER-alpha estrogen receptor. It was developed in China and reported in 2007.
How is it different from raloxifene?
It shares raloxifene's benzothiophene core but swaps the side chain, which makes it more ER-alpha selective and, in animal work, more selective for blocking breast tissue growth.
Does it affect cancer cells?
In lab studies it activates the AhR pathway and pushes triple-negative breast cancer cells toward apoptosis, which is an effect raloxifene does not have.
Is it approved or well-studied in people?
No. It is a preclinical compound with no human trials, sold only as a research chemical. Long-term safety in people is unknown.
Limitations of the evidence
- No human data exist; it is a preclinical research compound only
- Long-term safety in people is unknown
Adverse effects
- As a SERM, it may carry the class risk of blood clots
- Hot flashes are a possible estrogen-blocking effect
- Leg cramps have been associated with SERMs of this type