spec sheet11 rows
Cebaracetam is an experimental nootropic drug of the racetam family that was studied during the 1990s as a candidate treatment for cognitive and memory disorders [1]. In chemical terms it is a chlorinated, piperazinone-bearing analogue of phenylpiracetam, with the molecular formula C16H18ClN3O3 [2]. The compound advanced into phase II clinical trials, but its development was discontinued in 1995 and it was never marketed [1]. Its mechanism of action was never clearly defined.
- Possible memory support (class-inferred)
- Theoretical neuroprotection
- Racetam-class tolerability
Overview
Cebaracetam is a synthetic small molecule that belongs to the racetam class, a group of compounds sharing a 2-pyrrolidinone core that has been explored for possible effects on memory and cognition [1]. Its structure can be described as a piperazin-2-one analogue of 4-chlorophenylpiracetam, in which the terminal amide group of the parent racetam is replaced by a piperazine ring [1]. The molecule carries the formula C16H18ClN3O3 and a molar mass of roughly 335.8 grams per mole, and it is catalogued in chemical databases under its systematic name and registry identifiers [2].
The compound was developed as a pharmaceutical research candidate during the early and middle 1990s and carried the developmental code names CGS-25248 and ZY-15119 [1]. It was investigated as a potential therapy for disorders of cognition, and analytical methods were published for measuring it in human biological fluids, indicating that it reached the stage of human study [3]. Development ultimately did not continue past phase II, and the program was recorded as discontinued in 1995 [1].
Published research on cebaracetam is sparse. One methodological study described a fully automated high-performance liquid chromatography assay, based on solid-phase extraction with automated cartridge exchange, for determining the drug in human urine; that work reflects the kind of pharmacokinetic characterization carried out during its clinical evaluation [3]. Because the program was abandoned, no large efficacy trials or long-term data sets were ever published.
Cebaracetam never received marketing approval in any jurisdiction and is not an approved medicine [1]. Today it exists essentially as a discontinued investigational compound and a reference entry in chemical and drug-development databases, rather than as a commercial product or a widely sold supplement [1][2]. No standardized consumer formulation is recognized.
Mechanism
The way cebaracetam produces its effects was never firmly established, and reference sources describe its mechanism of action as undefined [1]. As a member of the racetam family it is structurally related to piracetam and phenylpiracetam, compounds that have generally been studied for possible modulation of neurotransmission and neuronal membrane function; even so, no specific receptor target or biochemical pathway was ever confirmed for cebaracetam itself [1][2]. In the absence of published pharmacodynamic studies, any detailed account of its central activity remains provisional.
receptor fingerprint
Cholinergic transmissionmodulates
(/) signalingmodulates
Neuronal resilience under ischemiaprotects
Dosingtypical ranges, not medical advice
interested in protocols and clinical dosages? make an account to see them! ^_^
Safetyrisks and cautions, not medical advice
There is little published human safety information for cebaracetam specifically. Racetams as a class tend to be relatively well tolerated, with headaches from cholinergic demand being a common complaint. Given the thin data, it warrants caution and careful attention to sourcing.
History
Cebaracetam is an experimental member of the racetam family that emerged from pharmaceutical cognition-enhancer programs of the late 1980s and early 1990s, carrying developmental code designations including N-1440 and CGS-25248. Structurally it is a substituted pyrrolidinone analogue related to the piracetam series, and it was advanced as a candidate for disorders of cognition. Developed within the Ciba-Geigy lineage that later became part of Novartis, cebaracetam progressed into phase II clinical evaluation before its development was discontinued around 1995. It was never marketed, and it remains an obscure compound known chiefly from patent and drug-pipeline records rather than any approved therapeutic use.
Reputation
Cebaracetam has essentially no popular reputation and is not a fixture of the consumer nootropics market; it is an abandoned clinical candidate rather than a compound with a user following. Among the small community that catalogs racetams, it is treated as a historical curiosity: a molecule that reached mid-stage trials and then vanished, with little published human efficacy data and a mechanism of action that was never clearly established. Because it was discontinued and is not readily available, discussion of cebaracetam is largely archival, and any claims about its effects should be regarded as speculative given the absence of substantial, accessible evidence.
Subjective profileweighing the evidence above
An obscure racetam with limited data; not one to prioritize over better-studied members.
Resources
This entry is here for reference.
Research
- 1.Risperidone versus olanzapine for schizophrenia.
- 2.Cebaracetam, PubChem Compound Summary (CID 65919)
- 3.Fast systematic approach for the determination of drugs in biological fluids by fully automated high-performance liquid chromatography with on-line solid-phase extraction and automated cartridge exchange. Application to cebaracetam in human urine.
3 listed here; entry last updated August 2026
Reviews
My notesprivate to this device
FAQ
How does it compare to piracetam?
It is far less studied. Piracetam has a large literature; cebaracetam has very little.
Will it cause racetam headaches?
Possibly. Adding a choline source is the usual mitigation for racetams.
Is there human data?
Very little. It is mostly a research-stage compound.
Is it worth trying?
Only if you specifically want to experiment; better-mapped racetams come first for me.
Limitations of the evidence
- Clinical development stopped at phase II
- No long-term human safety data available
Notes and cautions
- Human safety profile not established
- Never approved for medical use