spec sheet11 rows
Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of ketamine, the half of the racemic mixture that binds the NMDA receptor several times more tightly, and it is the only member of the ketamine family approved as an antidepressant. As the nasal spray Spravato it is licensed for treatment-resistant depression alongside an oral antidepressant, and for depressive symptoms in adults with active suicidal ideation. Administration is supervised: the dose is taken in a certified setting and the patient is observed for two hours afterwards, because sedation, dissociation and a transient rise in blood pressure are expected rather than rare. It is a real antidepressant with a real effect size and a genuinely inconvenient delivery model.
- Rapid antidepressant effect in treatment-resistant depression, added to an oral antidepressant
- Delays relapse substantially in patients who have already responded
- Rapid reduction of depressive symptoms in patients with active suicidal ideation
- Favoured over quetiapine on remission at week 8 and remission sustained to week 32 in a head-to-head trial
- Cognition does not appear to worsen with repeated supervised courses, and some measures improve as depression lifts
- About twice the anesthetic and analgesic potency of racemic ketamine, allowing roughly half the dose
- Dissociation and sedation are expected in-session effects, not rare ones
- Transient blood pressure rise peaking around 40 minutes after dosing
- Dizziness, nausea and vertigo are common
- Driving is prohibited for the remainder of the dosing day
- Abuse potential; it is a controlled substance dispensed under a restricted programme
Overview
Esketamine is (S)-ketamine, one of the two mirror-image forms that make up racemic ketamine. It has roughly four times the affinity for the NMDA receptor that the R-form has, which makes it about twice as potent as the racemate as an anesthetic and analgesic and allows roughly half the dose for the same effect [11].
Its importance is as an antidepressant. A dose-response study established that intranasal esketamine added to an oral antidepressant reduced depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant depression [1], and the phase 3 programme followed: a flexible-dose study in adults under 65 met its endpoint [2], a fixed-dose study produced a smaller and less consistent separation [3], and a study in patients over 65 did not meet its primary endpoint [4]. A relapse-prevention trial found that patients who had responded and then continued esketamine relapsed substantially later than those switched to placebo, which is the strongest single result in the programme [5]. Separate trials addressed acute suicidality and showed rapid symptom reduction without a demonstrated effect on suicidal ideation itself as a distinct outcome [6][7]. A later head-to-head trial against quetiapine, both added to an oral antidepressant, favoured esketamine on remission at week 8 and on remission sustained to week 32 [8].
It was approved in the United States in 2019 and is dispensed only through a restricted programme. The reason is not toxicity in the usual sense but the acute effects: sedation, dissociation, dizziness and a transient rise in blood pressure that peaks around 40 minutes after dosing, which is why the two-hour observation exists [9].
- The two enantiomers were never equally obvious choices. Animal work had repeatedly suggested the R-form was the more potent and longer-lasting antidepressant despite binding NMDA receptors more weakly, and the decision to develop the S-form was questioned in print while the trials were running [14].
- The strongest result in the phase 3 programme is not a symptom score but a delay: patients who had responded and stayed on esketamine relapsed substantially later than those switched to placebo [5].
- The trial in adults over 65 did not meet its primary endpoint, which is rarely mentioned alongside the approval [4].
Mechanism
Esketamine blocks the receptor as an uncompetitive, open-channel , plugging the pore of a receptor that is already active. It does this with roughly four times the affinity of arketamine, which is the pharmacological basis of the split: the same receptor occupancy is reached at about half the racemic dose [11].
The antidepressant action is not explained by that blockade alone. The prevailing account is that blocking receptors preferentially on inhibitory interneurons removes a brake on release, producing a brief glutamate surge that drives activation, release, and mTORC1 signalling, and the growth of new connections in prefrontal . That last step is slower than the drug's own clearance, which is why a dose given on Monday is still doing something on Thursday [15]. Preclinical work suggests the two enantiomers do not reach that endpoint the same way, with esketamine more directly engaging mTORC1 signalling and arketamine more directly engaging ERK signalling [13].
Whether the metabolites contribute is unsettled and is the subject of a separate argument in this literature. Esketamine is metabolised to (S)-norketamine and then to (2S,6S)-hydroxynorketamine, and both have shown antidepressant-like activity in some rodent models [16], while the corresponding claim for the R-series has not replicated cleanly [17].
receptor fingerprint
uncompetitive open-channel antagonist; roughly 4x the affinity of arketamine
surge / disinhibits glutamate release, raising AMPA throughput
/ / mTORC1activates; esketamine engages mTORC1 signalling more directly than arketamine
Blood pressuretransient rise peaking around 40 minutes post-dose
Dissociationcauses, dose-dependently and predictably
Safetyrisks and cautions, not medical advice
The acute effects are the safety story, and they are predictable rather than idiosyncratic. Dissociation, sedation, dizziness, nausea and a transient rise in blood pressure that typically peaks around 40 minutes after dosing occur commonly enough that the drug is given only in a certified setting with a two-hour observation period and a driving prohibition for the rest of the day [9]. Blood pressure is checked before dosing and again after; uncontrolled hypertension, aneurysmal vascular disease and a history of intracerebral haemorrhage are the situations where that rise stops being merely inconvenient.
Longer-term, the file is reassuring but shorter than the drug's use now is. Open-label follow-up has not shown the ulcerative cystitis that heavy recreational ketamine use causes, and has not shown cognitive decline; that reflects supervised intermittent dosing rather than any property of the enantiomer, and it is a smaller and shorter evidence base than the one behind established antidepressants [9]. It carries abuse potential and is a controlled substance. It is used with an oral antidepressant, not instead of one, and it is not a treatment anyone administers to themselves. This entry is educational and is not medical advice.
History
Ketamine was synthesized in 1962 and marketed as the racemate, an equal mixture of the S and R forms. The enantiomers were separated and studied from the 1980s onward, mostly by anesthesiologists interested in whether the S-form could deliver the same anesthesia with less of the emergence confusion that gave ketamine its reputation. Esketamine was marketed as an anesthetic in parts of Europe under the name Ketanest well before anyone proposed it as an antidepressant [11].
The antidepressant programme grew out of the finding, around the turn of the century, that sub-anesthetic racemic ketamine relieved severe depression within hours. Because the racemate was a generic anesthetic with no commercial route to approval, development went to the single enantiomer delivered as a nasal spray. A dose-finding trial reported in 2018 [1], the phase 3 studies read out through 2019 [2][3][4][5], and the nasal spray was approved in the United States in 2019 for treatment-resistant depression, with the suicidality indication following. Whether the chosen enantiomer was the right one has been questioned throughout, since animal data had suggested advantages for the R-form [14]. A head-to-head trial against quetiapine in 2023 gave the approved product its first active comparison [8].
Reputation
Esketamine occupies an unusual position: clinicians who are sceptical of the ketamine clinic industry generally regard the approved nasal spray as the legitimate version of the same idea, because it is the one that went through phase 3 and is given under observation. That respect is not universal. The programme is often criticised for the pattern of its results, since one of three short-term phase 3 trials clearly met its endpoint, the fixed-dose study separated weakly and the trial in older adults did not separate at all, and for comparing against a newly started oral antidepressant rather than against racemic ketamine [10].
Among patients the recurring complaints are practical rather than pharmacological: the cost, the requirement to attend a certified site twice weekly at the start, the two hours of observation and the inability to drive afterwards. The recurring surprise is that the dissociation is expected and usually settles within the observation window rather than being a sign something has gone wrong. The comparison people most often want, esketamine against generic intravenous racemic ketamine, has still not been run at the scale that would settle it [10].
Subjective profileweighing the evidence above
The most defensible way to get a ketamine-type antidepressant effect, precisely because it is the only one that had to prove itself in phase 3 and be dispensed under supervision. The relapse-prevention result is the strongest part of the file and the elderly trial is the weakest. The two-hour observation is the price of the mechanism, not bureaucracy; it is where sedation and the blood pressure rise actually happen.
Resources
This entry is here for reference.
Research
- 2017first citedKetamine for Depression, 3: Does Chirality Matter?
- 2018most active year4 papers
- 2024most recentEsketamine: Less Drowsiness, More Analgesia
- 1.Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- 2.Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study
- 3.Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1)
- 4.Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus an Oral Antidepressant in Elderly Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression-TRANSFORM-3
- 5.Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- 6.Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
- 7.Esketamine Nasal Spray for Rapid Reduction of Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Have Active Suicide Ideation With Intent: Results of a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized Study (ASPIRE II)
- 8.Esketamine Nasal Spray versus Quetiapine for Treatment-Resistant Depression
- 9.Long-term safety of ketamine and esketamine in treatment of depression
- 10.Synthesizing the Evidence for Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An International Expert Opinion on the Available Evidence and Implementation
- 11.Esketamine: Less Drowsiness, More Analgesia
- 12.Neurocognitive Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine for Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review
17 listed here; entry last updated August 2026
Reviews
My notesprivate to this device
FAQ
How is this different from just getting ketamine at a clinic?
Chemically it is half of it: the S-enantiomer, which binds the NMDA receptor about four times more tightly than the R-form [11]. Practically the difference is regulatory. Esketamine went through phase 3 trials, carries an approved indication, and is dispensed under a restricted programme with a two-hour observation. Racemic ketamine given in a clinic for depression is used off-label at doses and schedules that vary between providers. The direct comparison between the two at equivalent doses has not been run at a scale that would settle which is better [10].
Why do I have to stay for two hours?
Because that is when the effects happen. Sedation and dissociation appear during the session, and blood pressure typically peaks around 40 minutes after the dose before settling [9]. The observation window covers the period when someone should be watched, and it is also why driving is off the table for the rest of the day. It is a property of the drug rather than a formality.
Does it work better than other options for treatment-resistant depression?
In the one head-to-head trial run so far, esketamine added to an oral antidepressant produced more remission at week 8 than quetiapine added to an oral antidepressant, and more patients remained in remission through week 32 [8]. That is a genuine result against a real comparator. It has not been compared head-to-head against racemic ketamine or against electroconvulsive therapy in the same way, so it is not established as the best available option, only as better than one specific alternative.
Will it affect my memory or thinking?
Repeated supervised courses have not been shown to worsen cognition, and several measures improve as depression itself lifts, which is the more likely explanation for the improvement [12]. Within a session, thinking is clearly affected; that is the dissociation, and it resolves. This is a different situation from heavy unsupervised ketamine use, where cognitive complaints are well documented and dose and frequency are far higher.
Is it addictive?
It carries real abuse potential and is a controlled substance, which is a large part of why it is dispensed only in certified settings and never as a take-home prescription [9]. The supervised intermittent schedule exists specifically to keep the pattern of use from resembling the recreational pattern that causes bladder damage and dependence.
Can I take it instead of my antidepressant?
No. It is approved as an addition to an oral antidepressant, and every trial in the programme studied it that way [5]. Stopping an existing antidepressant to start it is not a supported use, and that decision belongs to the prescriber, not to this page.
Limitations of the evidence
- Of three short-term phase 3 trials, one clearly met its endpoint, the fixed-dose study separated weakly [3] and the trial in adults over 65 did not meet its primary endpoint [4]
- Trials compared esketamine plus a newly started oral antidepressant against placebo plus a newly started oral antidepressant, not against racemic ketamine [10]
- In the suicidality trials, depressive symptoms fell rapidly but an effect on suicidal ideation as a distinct outcome was not established [6][7]
- Long-term safety data covers a shorter period than the drug is now used for [9]
Adverse effects
- Dissociation and sedation are expected in-session effects, not rare ones
- Transient blood pressure rise peaking around 40 minutes after dosing
- Dizziness, nausea and vertigo are common
- Driving is prohibited for the remainder of the dosing day
- Abuse potential; it is a controlled substance dispensed under a restricted programme
Notes and cautions
- Given with an oral antidepressant, not as a replacement for one
- Dispensed only through a restricted programme with in-clinic administration and a two-hour observation
- Marketed as an anesthetic in parts of Europe long before the antidepressant indication existed [11]