spec sheet11 rows
Intepirdine is a selective serotonin 5-HT6 receptor antagonist originally discovered at GlaxoSmithKline as SB-742457 and later licensed to Axovant Sciences as RVT-101 for Alzheimer's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Like other compounds in its class it was intended to enhance cognition by disinhibiting cholinergic and glutamatergic signaling in cortex and hippocampus. A phase 2 study suggested a modest global and cognitive benefit, but the pivotal phase 3 MINDSET trial in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease was clearly negative. Its high-profile failure in 2017 effectively ended enthusiasm for 5-HT6 antagonism as a standalone dementia strategy.
- Selective 5-HT6 antagonism with a clean central target
- Produced a significant global-impression signal in phase 2
- Generally well tolerated with placebo-like safety
- Once-daily oral pharmacokinetics
- Mechanistically complementary to cholinesterase inhibitors
- Extensively characterized as a reference antagonist
- No defining organ-toxicity signal in trials
Overview
Intepirdine (SB-742457) is a quinoline-based 5-HT6 receptor antagonist that was carried through more than a decade of clinical development, first by GlaxoSmithKline and then by Axovant Sciences as RVT-101. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, the 35 mg dose produced a statistically significant benefit on the clinician's global impression of change (CIBIC+), with a supportive but non-significant trend on the ADAS-Cog cognitive scale [1].
On the strength of these and other mid-stage data, intepirdine advanced to the large phase 3 MINDSET trial, which randomized 1315 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease on stable donepezil to 35 mg per day or placebo for 24 weeks. MINDSET was unambiguously negative on both co-primary endpoints, cognition (ADAS-Cog) and daily function (ADCS-ADL), with a safety profile similar to placebo [2]. A parallel study in dementia with Lewy bodies also failed, and Axovant discontinued the programme.
Intepirdine is now cited alongside idalopirdine as the definitive clinical test of the 5-HT6 antagonist hypothesis for dementia [3]. Reviews of the class note the paradox that both 5-HT6 antagonists and agonists can enhance cognition in preclinical models, suggesting the receptor's pro-cognitive role is more nuanced than a simple on/off switch and helping explain the disappointing translational record.
- Intepirdine's phase 3 failure in 2017 wiped out most of Axovant Sciences' market value almost overnight, making it a well-known example of binary clinical-trial risk in biotech.
- The same molecule carried two different codenames across its life, SB-742457 at GlaxoSmithKline and RVT-101 at Axovant.
Mechanism
Intepirdine is a selective, competitive at the 5-HT6 receptor. Blocking this Gs-coupled receptor on interneurons in cortical and hippocampal networks reduces inhibitory tone and secondarily increases and release, which is the rationale for combining it with cholinesterase inhibitors. In receptor-efficacy assays some 5-HT6 antagonists behave as inverse agonists at constitutively active receptors, and intepirdine was characterized within this framework.
receptor fingerprint
5-HT6 receptorSelective competitive antagonism
Cortical interneuronsReduces 5-HT6 mediated inhibition
Cholinergic systemSecondary acetylcholine enhancement
Evidencehow good the literature is
Moderate clinical data; suggestive phase 2, definitively negative phase 3
Dosingtypical ranges, not medical advice
interested in protocols and clinical dosages? make an account to see them! ^_^
Safetyrisks and cautions, not medical advice
Across phase 2 and phase 3 studies intepirdine was generally safe and well tolerated, with adverse events largely comparable to placebo and no defining organ-toxicity signal at the tested dose. Because it never demonstrated efficacy, its benefit-risk balance was ultimately judged unfavourable purely on lack of effect rather than on toxicity. It is investigational and discontinued, with no approved human dosing.
History
Discovered at GlaxoSmithKline as SB-742457, the compound was later acquired by Roivant subsidiary Axovant Sciences and rebranded RVT-101, becoming the centerpiece of one of the most watched neurology biotech stories of the mid-2010s. When the phase 3 MINDSET trial failed in September 2017, followed by a negative dementia-with-Lewy-bodies study, Axovant's valuation collapsed and the compound was abandoned.
Reputation
Intepirdine is widely remembered as a cautionary tale in both drug development and biotech investing, illustrating how a plausible mechanism and a promising phase 2 can still yield a decisive phase 3 failure. Scientifically it remains a useful, well-characterized reference antagonist for 5-HT6 pharmacology.
Subjective profileweighing the evidence above
Nothing to take away except the lesson. It was clean, well tolerated and once daily, and it still failed decisively in phase 3 for Alzheimer's and again in Lewy body dementia. A tidy mechanism is not a working drug; this one is discontinued and not legitimately available.
Resources
This entry is here for reference.
Research
- 2010first citedDouble-blind, controlled phase II study of a 5-HT6 receptor antagonist, SB-742457, in Alzheimer…
- 2021most recentIntepirdine as adjunctive therapy to donepezil for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a rand…
- 1.Double-blind, controlled phase II study of a 5-HT6 receptor antagonist, SB-742457, in Alzheimer's disease
- 2.Intepirdine as adjunctive therapy to donepezil for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial (MINDSET)
- 3.The role of 5-HT6-receptor antagonists in Alzheimer's disease: an update
3 listed here; entry last updated August 2026
Reviews
My notesprivate to this device
FAQ
Is intepirdine the same as SB-742457 and RVT-101?
Yes. SB-742457 was the GlaxoSmithKline codename and RVT-101 the Axovant codename for the same molecule, intepirdine.
Did intepirdine work for Alzheimer's disease?
No. A promising phase 2 signal was not confirmed; the phase 3 MINDSET trial was negative on both cognition and daily function.
Was it tested for anything besides Alzheimer's disease?
Yes, it was also studied in dementia with Lewy bodies, where it likewise failed to show benefit.
Is it safe?
In trials it was generally safe and well tolerated, comparable to placebo; its failure was about lack of efficacy, not toxicity.
What was it combined with?
It was tested as an add-on to the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil, mirroring the whole 5-HT6 antagonist class strategy.
Limitations of the evidence
- No confirmed clinical efficacy in phase 3 (MINDSET negative)
- Also failed in dementia with Lewy bodies
- Investigational and discontinued, not legitimately available
Notes and cautions
- Any adverse effects were generally mild and placebo-comparable